Pocket Option
App for
Install
News & Events 96
Knowledge base 2656
Interesting 993
Eng
EnglishSpanishFrenchItalianPolishPortugueseThaiTurkishVietnamese

Zero-Commission Trading: Pros, Cons, and Hidden Costs

Mieszko Michalski
Written by Mieszko Michalski
05 Sep 2025
6 min to read
Zero-Commission Trading: Pros, Cons, and Hidden Costs
273

The brokerage industry landscape has undergone a radical transformation in recent years, with the emergence of zero-commission trading platforms fundamentally reshaping how retail investors participate in financial markets. This seismic shift, initially pioneered by fintech disruptors like Robinhood, has now forced even traditional brokerage giants to eliminate trading fees, creating a new paradigm where "free trades" have become the industry standard rather than an exception.

Article navigation

 

At its core, the zero-commission model represents both democratization and commercialization of investing. On one hand, it has removed significant financial barriers that once made active trading prohibitively expensive for small investors. Gone are the days when a retail trader would see their potential profits evaporate under the weight of $5-$10 commission fees per trade. This liberation from per-trade costs has particularly empowered millennial and Gen Z investors, fueling an unprecedented surge in retail market participation through sleek, mobile-first trading platforms.

However, beneath the surface of this apparent investor utopia lies a more complex reality. The elimination of commissions hasn’t made trading truly free – it has simply shifted the cost structure in ways that aren’t always transparent to end users. Brokerages have developed sophisticated alternative revenue streams, from selling order flow to market makers to monetizing spreads and offering premium subscription services. These hidden monetization methods raise critical questions about potential conflicts of interest and whether investors are unknowingly paying in other ways.

The timing of this revolution couldn’t be more significant. In the post-pandemic financial landscape, we’ve seen retail trading volumes reach historic highs, with platforms like eToro and Robinhood reporting millions of new accounts. This surge has coincided with – and arguably contributed to – new market phenomena like the meme stock frenzy, where the combination of zero-commission trading and social media created unprecedented volatility in certain equities.

Regulators worldwide have taken notice of these developments. In the United States, the SEC has intensified its scrutiny of payment for order flow practices, while European regulators under ESMA have taken a more restrictive stance. These regulatory responses reflect growing concerns about whether the zero-commission model truly serves investor interests or simply repackages costs in less transparent ways.

For investors navigating this new environment, understanding the nuances of zero-commission trading has become essential. While the benefits for casual, long-term investors are clear, more active traders need to be aware of potential pitfalls like:

  • The impact of order routing practices on execution quality
  • How wider spreads might affect trading profitability
  • The hidden costs lurking in currency conversions and other ancillary fees
  • The limitations these platforms may impose on certain trading strategies

This guide aims to peel back the layers of the zero-commission phenomenon, providing investors with the insights needed to make informed decisions in this transformed trading landscape. Whether you’re a passive index fund investor or an active day trader, understanding where the true costs and benefits lie will be crucial to maximizing your investment outcomes in the era of “free” trading.

🔍 Chapter 1: The Hidden Mechanics of Zero-Commission Trading

1.1 The Disruption of Traditional Brokerage Models

The brokerage industry has undergone a radical transformation in the past decade. Before 2013, retail investors routinely paid between $5 to $30 per trade, with discount brokers like E*TRADE and TD Ameritrade charging $7-10 for standard equity trades. Full-service firms like Merrill Lynch could charge $50 or more per transaction. This created significant barriers to entry for small investors.

The revolution began when Robinhood launched in 2013 with its commission-free model, forcing the entire industry to adapt. By October 2019, all major U.S. brokers had eliminated trading fees. This seismic shift was made possible by three key technological and financial innovations:

  1. Cloud Computing Infrastructure – Reduced operational costs by 60-70% compared to maintaining physical data centers
  2. Mobile-First Platforms – Eliminated the need for expensive desktop trading software
  3. Alternative Revenue Streams – Developed sophisticated monetization methods beyond commissions [1]

1.2 The Four Pillars of “Free” Trading Revenue

When brokers removed commissions, they replaced this income through four primary channels:

  1. Payment for Order Flow (PFOF)
  • Brokers sell order execution to market makers like Citadel Securities and Virtu Financial
  • Market makers profit from the bid-ask spread
  • In 2023, Robinhood generated $1.8 billion (78% of total revenue) from PFOF
  • Controversy: Creates potential conflict of interest in trade execution quality

💼 Case Study 1: Sarah’s “Free” Trade Experience
Sarah, a 28-year-old freelance designer, buys 20 shares of TechCo at $50/share on Robinhood:

  • Her order is routed to Citadel instead of directly to NASDAQ
  • Citadel executes at $50.02 (slightly worse than NBBO)
  • Robinhood receives $0.002 per share ($0.04 total) from Citadel
  • While Sarah sees “$0 commission,” she effectively pays $0.40 more than optimal price
  1. Margin Lending & Cash Management
  • Interest charges on margin balances (typically 6.5-12% APR)
  • Robinhood Gold charges $5-200/month for margin access
  • Brokers earn interest on uninvested cash (often paying users below-market rates)
  • Accounts for 15-25% of revenue at most retail brokers
  1. Premium Subscriptions & Services
  • Advanced tools and data for monthly fees ($5-30/month)
  • Examples: Webull’s $1.99 Level 2 data, eToro’s $9.99 “Pro” membership
  • Fastest growing revenue stream (40% YoY industry growth) [8]

💼 Case Study 2: Mike’s Day Trading Journey
Mike, a 35-year-old aspiring trader:

  • Chooses Webull for its “free” platform
  • Pays $1.99/month for Level 2 market data
  • Makes 75 trades/month – saves $750 vs traditional brokers
  • However, experiences:
    • $0.03 average price improvement deficit
    • $225 in cumulative spread costs
    • $50 in subscription fees
  • Net savings: $475/month (37% less than expected)
  1. Foreign Exchange & Ancillary Fees
  • Hidden FX markups (1-3%) on international trades
  • Account transfer fees ($75-100 per transfer)
  • Options contract fees ($0.50-1.00 per contract)

1.3 The Global Regulatory Landscape

United States:

  • SEC allows PFOF but requires detailed disclosure (Rule 606 reports)
  • Recent proposals to ban PFOF under consideration
  • Payment for order flow accounts for 60% of retail broker revenue

European Union:

  • ESMA effectively banned PFOF through MiFID II regulations
  • Brokers rely more on spreads and subscription models
  • Typical EUR/USD spreads 0.1-0.3% vs 0.02-0.05% in US

Emerging Markets:

  • Brazil’s CVM requires explicit disclosure of all revenue sources
  • Mexico’s CNBV caps PFOF at 0.05% of trade value
  • India’s SEBI banned PFOF entirely in 2022

Key Insight: While zero-commission trading has democratized market access, the true cost structure creates complex trade-offs between accessibility, execution quality, and hidden expenses. Understanding these mechanics is crucial for investors to make informed platform choices. [4]

✅ Chapter 2: The True Winners and Losers of Zero-Commission Trading

2.1 Who Actually Benefits?

Zero-commission trading has created clear winners, but not all investors benefit equally. The model favors specific user profiles:

✔ Long-Term Investors (Best Fit)

  • Typical Activity: 1-5 trades/month
  • Strategy: Dollar-cost averaging into ETFs or blue-chip stocks
  • Why It Works: No recurring fees eat into compounding returns

💼 Case Study 3: Maria, 45 (accountant)

  • Invests $1,000 monthly into SPY and QQQ
  • Saves $120/year vs traditional brokers
  • Minimal impact from spreads or PFOF [10]

✔ Small Account Holders (<$25k)

  • Advantage: Fractional shares enable diversified portfolios
  • Example: $100 can buy pieces of Amazon, Google, and Tesla
  • Hidden Benefit: No minimum balance requirements

✔ Educational Users

  • Benefit: Risk-free way to learn market mechanics
  • Ideal Use: Paper trading or micro-position testing

2.2 Who Gets Hurt by “Free” Trading?

For these traders, hidden costs often outweigh commission savings:

❌ Active Day Traders (5+ trades/day)

  • Problem: Poor execution quality compounds
  • Math:
    • 50 trades/week × $0.03 price slippage = $1,500/year
    • Wipes out any commission savings

💼 Case Study 4: David, 29 (former day trader)

  • Switched from TD to Robinhood to “save on fees”
  • Later discovered his fills were consistently worse
  • Net loss: $2,100/year vs traditional broker

❌ Options Traders

  • Hidden Costs:
    • $0.50-$1.00 per contract in PFOF
    • Assignment/exercise fees at many brokers
  • Example: Selling puts on Robinhood vs Tastyworks
    • Appears free but loses $5 per contract in execution

❌ International Investors

  • Pain Points:
    • 1.5-3% FX fees on currency conversion
    • Limited local market access
  • Regional Impact:
    • Brazilian traders pay 2% extra on US stocks
    • EU investors face wider spreads without PFOF [13]

2.3 The Psychology of “Free”

Behavioral economics reveals troubling patterns:

🧠 The Overtrading Effect

  • Robinhood users trade 5X more than Schwab clients
  • Study shows active traders underperform by 6.5% annually

🎮 Gamification Dangers

  • Confetti animations → dopamine hits → more trading
  • “Lottery ticket” bias: 23% of users chase meme stocks

💸 False Savings Illusion

  • 68% of users believe they pay nothing (FINRA survey)
  • Reality: Average hidden cost = 0.25-1% per trade

2.4 New Case Studies

Success Story:

  • Investor: Rachel, 35 (teacher)
  • Strategy: Buys $300/week of VTI and SCHD
  • Platform: Fidelity (zero-commission)
  • Results:
    • $0 in explicit fees
    • Only 0.01% spread impact
    • $156/year saved vs old broker

Cautionary Tale:

  • Investor: Mark, 41 (restaurant owner)
  • Strategy: Trades 3x daily using Robinhood Gold
  • Cost Breakdown:
    • $10/month subscription
    • $2,100 in spread losses
    • $300 in PFOF costs
  • Net Outcome: Paid 3.2% more than traditional broker

2.5 Global Realities

🌎 United States

  • Pros: True zero-commission via PFOF
  • Cons: Regulatory uncertainty (SEC scrutiny)

🇪🇺 European Union

  • Pros: No PFOF = better execution
  • Cons: Higher account minimums (€2,000 average)

🇧🇷 Brazil

  • Pros: XP Investimentos offers free trades
  • Cons: 2% IOF tax on foreign stocks

Key Insight: Zero-commission trading works best when aligned with your strategy. Passive investors win, active traders often lose, and everyone should audit their true costs quarterly. The most expensive broker may be the one that appears “free.” [7]

⚠️ Chapter 3: The Hidden Costs of “Free” Trading – What They Don’t Tell You

The Spread Tax: Your Invisible Trading Cost

Every time you place a trade, you’re paying what professionals call “the spread tax” – the difference between the bid and ask prices. While this exists in all trading, zero-commission platforms often have wider spreads:

Real-World Example:

  • Stock XYZ shows $50.00 (bid) – $50.05 (ask)
  • On a premium broker: You might get filled at $50.02
  • On a free platform: You typically get $50.03 or $50.04
  • For 100 shares: That’s $1-2 extra per trade

Why This Matters:

  • For 50 trades/month: $50-$100 in hidden costs
  • Compounded over a year: $600-$1,200 lost to spreads
  • For options traders: Spreads can be 5-10x worse [9]

Payment for Order Flow: The Broker’s Secret Revenue

When your broker claims “no commissions,” they’re making money by selling your orders:

How PFOF Works:

  1. You click “buy” on Robinhood
  2. Your order goes to Citadel instead of the exchange
  3. Citadel pays Robinhood $0.002 per share
  4. You get slightly worse execution (often $0.01-$0.03 per share)

The Math:

  • 500 shares/day × $0.02 = $10 daily
  • 250 trading days = $2,500 annual loss

The Data Trap: Paying for What Should Be Free

Many “free” platforms charge for essential tools:

Common Hidden Fees:

  • Real-time data: $10-$30/month
  • Level 2 quotes: $5-$20/month
  • Advanced charting: $10-$50/month

💼 Case Study 5:
James, a part-time trader, thought he was saving money until he realized:

  • $25/month for basic tools
  • $1,000/year in worse execution
    Total cost: $1,300 vs $500 at a premium broker

Currency Conversion: The Global Investor’s Nightmare

For non-US traders, FX fees add up quickly:

Typical Charges:

  • 1% fee when depositing USD
  • 1% fee when converting back
  • 0.5% spread on all foreign stocks

Example:
Maria in Brazil invests $10,000 in Apple:

  • $100 deposit fee
  • $50 annual spread costs
  • $100 to withdraw
    Total: $250 (2.5%) before any gains [3]

How to Fight Back Against Hidden Costs

  1. Check Your Fill Quality
    • Compare to the NBBO (National Best Bid/Offer)
    • Free tools like TradingView can help
  2. Calculate Your True Costs
    • (Your fill price – midpoint) × shares
    • Track this over 20+ trades
  3. Consider Alternative Brokers
    • Interactive Brokers: Low commissions but tight spreads
    • Fidelity: Free trades with better execution
    • Schwab: Good middle ground

Pro Tip: For portfolios over $50,000, paying small commissions often works out cheaper than “free” trading when you factor in execution quality.

The Hard Truth: There’s no such thing as a free trade. The question isn’t whether you’re paying – it’s how much and how transparently. Smart investors choose brokers based on total cost, not just commission headlines. [5]

📊 Chapter 4: Smart Zero-Commission Trading Strategies with Real Case Studies

4.1 Choosing the Right Platform for Your Trading Style

For Passive Investors (Case Study: Emma’s Retirement Portfolio)

Best Platforms: Robinhood, M1 Finance
Why They Work:

  • Automatic ETF investing (great for dollar-cost averaging)
  • Fractional shares allow small, regular investments

Emma’s Results (Age 32, Teacher):

  • Invests $500/month into VTI and VXUS
  • Saved $60/year in commissions vs traditional broker
  • Spread costs minimal at just $12/year
  • Net annual savings: $48

For Active Traders (Case Study: David’s Day Trading Journey)

Recommended Platforms: Webull, TradeStation
Key Features Needed:

  • Free Level 2 market data
  • Advanced charting tools
  • Fast execution speeds

David’s Experience (Age 28, Part-Time Trader):

  • Makes 20 trades/day (400/month)
  • Saved $800/month in commissions
  • But paid $600/month in spread costs and $50 for data
  • Net savings: $150/month (less than expected) [6]

Performance Comparison:

4.2 Optimizing Order Execution (With Examples)

Limit Order Strategies That Work

💼 Case Study 6: Sarah’s Small Account

  • Account size: $5,000
  • Strategy: Sets limit orders at mid-point of spread
  • Results:
    • Gets 0.02% better execution vs market orders
    • Saves $80/year on 100 trades

Advanced Technique:
For volatile stocks:

  1. Watch order book for 30 seconds
  2. Set buy limit at bid + 25% of spread
  3. Set sell limit at ask – 25%
  4. Adjust every 10 minutes

4.3 When Paying Actually Saves Money

💼 Case Study 7: Professional Trader Mike

Situation:

  • Trades 100+ contracts/day
  • Uses “free” platform but loses on execution

Solution:

  • Switched to Interactive Brokers ($0.65/contract)
  • Results:
    • Pays $650/month in commissions
    • But saves $1,200/month in better fills
    • Net gain: $550/month

Premium Services Worth Paying For:

  1. Professional execution ($1-5/trade) – worth it above $50k account
  2. Tax optimization tools – saves 15-20% in capital gains
  3. Institutional research – valuable above $250k portfolio

4.4 Global Platform Strategies

💼 Case Study 8: Carlos in Brazil

Challenge:

  • Wanted to trade US stocks
  • Faced 2% FX fees + local taxes

Solution:

  • Uses XP Investimentos for local stocks
  • Interactive Brokers for international
  • Saves 1.5% annually on FX costs

Regional Guide:

Key Takeaways:

  • Free platforms work best for buy-and-hold investors
  • Active traders often do better with paid execution
  • Always calculate your true costs – not just commissions
  • Consider splitting accounts between platforms

Pro Tip: Run a 30-day test – track execution quality on your current platform versus alternatives. Many traders are shocked by the results! [2]

🔍 Chapter 5: The Future of Zero-Commission Trading – Trends and Predictions

5.1 The Regulatory Landscape Ahead

Imminent Changes in Major Markets

United States:

  • SEC’s proposed Order Competition Rule (2024)
  • Potential PFOF restrictions following EU’s lead
  • Stricter best execution requirements

European Union:

  • MiFID III amendments targeting spread manipulation
  • Unified fee disclosure standards across EU members
  • Tighter dark pool regulations

Asia-Pacific:

  • Harmonization of trading rules across ASEAN markets
  • China’s digital yuan integration with brokerage accounts

💼Case Study 9: The UK Experiment

  • After 2022 PFOF ban:
  • Spreads widened by 0.03% on average
  • Trading volumes dropped 15% among retail investors
  • Platform fees emerged (£3-£5 per trade) [5] 

5.2 Technological Disruptions Reshaping the Industry

Blockchain Integration

  • Tokenized securities enabling true peer-to-peer trading
  • Smart contracts for instant settlement (T+0)
  • Case Example: Fidelity’s Bitcoin-integrated brokerage accounts

AI-Powered Execution

  • Predictive order routing algorithms
  • Real-time spread optimization tools
  • JP Morgan’s AI execution system (saving $150M annually)

The Democratization of Institutional Tools

  • Retail access to:
  • Algorithmic trading suites
  • Synthetic ETFs
  • Dark pool liquidity

Comparative Analysis:

5.3 The Coming Platform Wars

Emerging Business Models:

  • Freemium 2.0
  • Free basic trading
  • $50-$300/month for institutional-grade tools
  • Social Trading Ecosystems
  • Profit-sharing models
  • Copy-trading marketplaces
  • Bank-Broker Hybrids
  • Chase, Goldman’s Marcus integrating trading
  • One-stop financial supermarkets

💼Case Study 10: Robinhood’s Transformation (2023-2024)

  • Introduced $5/month “Gold Pro” tier
  • Added institutional order types
  • Saw 25% increase in active traders
  • But lost 40% of passive investors to Fidelity [2]

5.4 The Global Zero-Commission Map in 2025

North America:

  • PFOF likely restricted but not eliminated
  • More transparent pricing models
  • Canada may follow US lead

Europe:

  • Continued emphasis on explicit pricing
  • Potential “freemium” explosion
  • UK as test market for hybrid models

Asia:

  • China’s zero-commission platforms going global
  • India’s surprising reversal on PFOF ban
  • Singapore as regional fintech hub

Latin America:

  • Brazil leading in innovative models
  • Mexico’s rapid adoption
  • Argentina’s crypto-brokerage hybrids

5.5 Preparing Your Portfolio for the Changes

Actionable Steps:

  • Diversify Your Brokerage Relationships
  • Keep some assets with traditional brokers
  • Use zero-commission for specific strategies
  • Stay Informed About Regulations
  • Follow SEC/ESMA announcements
  • Join broker advisory panels
  • Test New Technologies Gradually
  • Allocate 5-10% to blockchain trading
  • Experiment with AI tools
  • Review Your Cost Structure Quarterly
  • Recalculate your true trading costs
  • Adjust strategies accordingly

The Expert Outlook:
“We’re entering phase two of the zero-commission revolution where transparency and value-added services will differentiate winners from losers. The most successful investors will be those who can navigate both free and premium ecosystems strategically.” – Sarah Johnson, Fintech Analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence

Final Thought: The future belongs to flexible investors who can harness zero-commission platforms while avoiding their pitfalls. As the landscape evolves, staying adaptable will be more valuable than any single trading strategy. [6]

🎯 Conclusion: Mastering the Zero-Commission Era

Key Lessons from Our Deep Dive

After examining zero-commission trading from all angles, three fundamental truths emerge:

  1. There’s No Free Lunch
    While commissions have disappeared, costs have simply shifted to spreads, order flow payments, and premium services. The average retail trader pays 0.1%-0.5% per trade in hidden costs.
  2. Your Strategy Determines Your Savings
  • Passive investors save $50-$300/year
  • Active traders often lose $1,000+ annually
  • Options traders face the worst hidden costs
  1. Geography Matters
  • US traders benefit most from current models
  • EU investors get better execution but fewer features
  • Emerging markets face layered FX and tax costs

The Investor’s Action Plan

For Beginners ($0-$25k portfolios):

  • Stick with Robinhood/Webull for learning
  • Use limit orders exclusively
  • Avoid margin and options initially

For Serious Investors ($25k-$250k):

  • Split assets between:
    • Zero-commission platform for long-term holds
    • Premium broker (IBKR/Schwab) for active trading
  • Pay for tax optimization tools

For Advanced Traders ($250k+):

  • Negotiate custom commission rates
  • Access institutional execution venues
  • Consider hiring a trading cost analyst

The Future-Proof Checklist

As the industry evolves, regularly:

✅ Audit your true costs (NBBO comparisons)
✅ Rebalance between platforms annually
✅ Test new technologies cautiously
✅ Monitor regulatory changes quarterly

Final Word of Wisdom

“The best trading platform isn’t the one with the lowest advertised costs, but the one that aligns with your strategy while providing transparent execution. In today’s markets, what you don’t know about your order flow can hurt you more than any commission ever did.”

Start Trading

 

📚 Sources and References

Academic & Regulatory Sources

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) – “Payment for Order Flow and Best Execution”(2023)
🔗 https://www.sec.gov

European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) – “MiFID II Review: Zero-Commission Brokerage Models” (2023)
🔗 https://www.esma.europa.eu

Bank for International Settlements (BIS) – “Retail Trading and Market Structure Evolution” (2024)
🔗 https://www.bis.org

CFA Institute – “The Hidden Costs of Zero-Commission Trading” (2023)
🔗 https://www.cfainstitute.org

Industry Reports & Analysis

Bloomberg Intelligence – “Zero-Commission Brokerage Revenue Models” (2024)
🔗 https://www.bloomberg.com/professional

JP Morgan Equity Research – “AI in Retail Trading Execution” (2024)
🔗 https://www.jpmorgan.com

TradingView – “Global Spread Comparison Across Brokers” (2023)
🔗 https://www.tradingview.com

Case Studies & Broker Data

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (SEC 10-K Filing, 2023)
🔗 https://investors.robinhood.com

Interactive Brokers – Rule 606 Order Routing Reports (Q1 2024)
🔗 https://www.interactivebrokers.com

Brazilian Securities Commission (CVM) – Retail Trading Study (2023)
🔗 https://www.gov.br/cvm

Additional Reading

Investopedia – “How Brokers Make Money Without Commissions” (2024)
🔗 https://www.investopedia.com

The Wall Street Journal – “The True Cost of Free Trading” (2023)
🔗 https://www.wsj.com

Financial Times – “Global Trends in Retail Investing” (2024)
🔗 https://www.ft.com

 

FAQ

Is zero-commission trading really free?

No. While brokers don’t charge explicit fees, they earn through:Payment for Order Flow (PFOF): Selling your orders to market makers.Wider spreads: You may get slightly worse prices.Premium subscriptions: Advanced tools often cost extra.Example: Robinhood made $1.8B from PFOF in 2023.

Who benefits most from zero-commission brokers?

✔ Passive investors (buy-and-hold ETFs, infrequent trading)✔ Small accounts (<$25K) using fractional shares✔ Beginners learning with small positionsCase Study: A passive investor saving $60/year vs traditional brokers.

What are the biggest hidden costs?

Spreads: 0.01%-0.5% per trade.Slow execution: Especially during volatility.FX fees: 1-3% for international stocks.Data: Active traders lose $1,000+/year on poor fills.

How do I check if my broker is costing me money?

Compare fills to NBBO (National Best Bid/Offer).Review your broker’s SEC Rule 606 report.Track spread impact over 20+ trades.Pro Tip: Try identical trades on Webull vs IBKR to compare execution.

Will zero-commission trading last?

Likely, but with changes:Regulators may restrict PFOF (like in the EU).New fees could emerge (e.g., subscriptions).Better tech (AI, blockchain) may reduce costs.Prediction: More "freemium" models (free basic trading + paid upgrades).

About the author :

Mieszko Michalski
Mieszko Michalski
More than 6 years of day trading experience across crypto and stock markets.

Mieszko Michalski is an experienced trader with 6 years of experience specializing in quick trading, day trading, swing trading and long-term investing. He was born on March 11, 1987 and currently lives in Lublin (Poland).

Passionate about financial markets and dedicated to helping others navigate the complexities of trading.

Basic education: Finance and Accounting, Warsaw School of Economics (SGH)

Additional education:

  • Udemy – Advanced Cryptocurrency Trading Course “How to make money regardless of bull or bear markets”
  • Blockchain Council – Certified Cryptocurrency Trader
  • Rocket Fuel – Cryptocurrency Investing & Trading
View full bio
Related topics :
trading
User avatar
Your comment
Comments are pre-moderated to ensure they comply with our blog guidelines.